NexAgent AI
Vancouver local team online
Before we start
Leave your contact — our AI consultant answers right away, and a human can follow up when needed.
Learn the useful structure behind early WeChat viral-writing cases: audience emotion, headline conflict, story structure, and shareability — while adding fact checks, risk cooling, and human review to the AI writing process.
5
Viral Parts
SAFE
Writing Frame
3
AI Prompts
7 pp
PDF Notes
Materials unlock after a lightweight lead form collecting email, phone, and topic interests.
To share materials with interested learners, leave your basic info and topics first. The file opens automatically after submission.
From case study and headline engineering to a governed AI writing system.
Why the case is worth analyzing but not copying
Audience, emotion, conflict, outlet, share reason
Headline pools, self-scoring, risk scoring
From emotional opening to method and evidence
Signal, Angle, Form, Evidence
Clicks, completion, shares, inquiries, and negative feedback
The useful lesson is not a controversial writing style; it is the systematic design of audience, emotion, conflict, story, and shareability.
Signal
Find real problems in chats, comments, consultations, and sales calls.
Angle
Turn a generic topic into a content angle with conflict, identification, and an action outlet.
Form
Use a seven-part structure for opening, scene, breakdown, reversal, method, example, and ending.
Evidence
Check unverified claims, absolute promises, anxiety amplification, and brand risk.
Before publishing, check: 1. Is the target reader specific enough? 2. Does the headline have conflict without exaggeration or fearmongering? 3. Does the article provide an action outlet instead of only stimulating emotion? 4. Are claims, data, stories, and judgments sourced or clearly bounded? 5. Does it attack real groups or manufacture unnecessary conflict? 6. Has the AI draft gone through fact checks and human review? 7. Does the ending provide a reasonable share reason? 8. Will you record clicks, completion, shares, inquiries, and negative feedback?
| Time | Duration | Module | Mode |
|---|---|---|---|
| 00:00–10:00 | 10 min | Why the Mimeng case is worth analyzing but not copying | Explain |
| 10:00–25:00 | 15 min | The five parts of viral articles | Breakdown |
| 25:00–40:00 | 15 min | Headline engineering and risk scoring | Practice |
| 40:00–55:00 | 15 min | Seven-part article structure | Workshop |
| 55:00–75:00 | 20 min | SAFE Writing Loop and AI prompts | Demo |
| 75:00–90:00 | 15 min | Post-publish review and next topic queue | Review |
For teams that want stronger long-form content while preserving evidence, boundaries, and long-term brand trust.
No. The course analyzes structural capabilities from early WeChat viral-writing cases: audience, emotion, conflict, story, and share reason. It explicitly excludes fabrication, clickbait, anxiety selling, and extreme labeling.
Do not set the goal as 'write a viral article.' A safer goal is to let AI generate topic angles, headline pools, article skeletons, and risk checks, while humans handle fact checks and publishing judgment.
Yes, but business content needs stronger tone and evidence control. SAFE Writing Loop keeps distribution power and long-term trust in the same workflow.
We can help you turn topic intake, headlines, long-form structure, fact checks, risk cooling, and publishing review into an executable agent workflow.